Ryan Benson et al

Home Up

Back Up Next

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

                                                                                                                                                                        

Author: Ryan Benson, Matt Dowsett, Tim Grabski, Paul Geedes

Institution:  Institution:  Curtin University of Technology Western Australia 2001 

Title:  The effect of shelter type on growth & survival in juvenile greenlip abalone, Haliotis laevigata (Donovan)

                                                                                                                                                                        

The effect of shelter type on growth & survival in juvenile greenlip abalone,

Haliotis laevigata (Donovan)

 

Ryan Benson, Matt Dowsett, Tim Grabski, Paul Geddes

 

Curtin University of Technology, Muresk Institute of Agriculture,

Aquatic Research Unit, Suite 2 Technology Park, Bentley, Western Australia

Abstract

Juvenile greenlip abalone, Haliotis laevigata, (Donovan) with an initial mean weight 2.53 ± 0.37g and length of 21.92 ± 1.53 mm were stocked and reared in a recirculating seawater system of 9 tanks containing different shelters. The shelters used were PVC piping, corrugated plastic sheeting and pre-fabricated Besser® blocks, with three replications of each treatment. Each tank was randomly allocated 12 abalone from the initial stock of 108 animals. The tanks were filled with 320 litres each, with the water temperature maintained at 18 ± 2oC throughout the experiment, for 60 days. The abalone were fed a commercially available abalone pellet three times per week at 2% of total body weight.

Over the 60 day period the tanks containing Besser® blocks had a mean increase in dorsal-ventral shell length of 4.51 ± 0.14mm and an increase in wet weight of 0.63 ± 0.11g. The mean dorsal-ventral length in the tanks containing PVC piping increased 2.8 ± 0.94mm and mean wet weight grew 0.52 ± 0.37mm. Plastic corrugated sheeting provided a mean growth of 2.61 ± 0.28mm in the dorsal-ventral length and 0.32 ± 0.10mm in the wet weight.

Survival at the end of the experiment showed that the abalone in the tanks with Besser® blocks had the highest mean survival at 75%, compared to the pipe mean survival at 69.44% and the plastic at 66.67%.

It was evident that the abalone preferred to grow on and be sheltered in the bricks rather than the other shelters, showing a significant difference (a =0.05) in wet weights having p-value = 0.88. The piping being the next most preferred and the plastic being the least preferred substrate and survival replicated this preference.

Keywords: shelter, greenlip abalone, wet weight, dorsal-ventral length

 

Introduction

Abalone farming has shown the potential to become a lucrative new growth industry in the Australian aquaculture environment with the abalone aquaculture industry rivalling the output of the wild fishery on a worldwide basis. The animals’ high value and the recent dietary break-throughs, combined with an increased understanding of the breeding technology and husbandry methods have made it an attractive investment throughout southern Australia (Mosig, 2001).

The efficiency of abalone production has been increased through the introduction of successful land-based systems suitable for culturing. It has been found that the farms culture their shellfish utilising three main methods; in shallow lightweight modular raceways (approximately 50mm water depth), in deeper trough systems or completely darkened conduit pipe (Fisheries Victoria, 2001).

The introduction of these land-based culture systems and a further understanding of the animals’ biology has been paramount in the success of Greenlip abalone

(Haliotis laevigata) aquaculture. H. laevigata are found to naturally inhabit reefs of the surf zone and may exist up to depths of 40m, ranging from Cape Leeuwin in WA along the southern coast to the south of New South Wales. Owing to the nature of the southern coastline with its high swell and wave energy the adoption of traditional ocean-based farming methods ("on reef" ranching) has been unfeasible.

The design of land-based systems within Australia has taken into account the required surface area to volume ratio that was established in previous studies (Hone, 1997). Effective surface area is the area available for the abalone during the inactive daylight period, and includes the internal tank surface area and the curved internal shelter surface area (Hindrum, 1998). A higher surface area to volume ratio has been found to produce increased growth rates. The effective surface area within deeper flow through systems has been further enhanced by the placement of internal bricks or plastic structures (Fisheries Victoria, 2001).

Studies done by Hindrum, Maguire, Edwards, Bourke and Deon (1998) have found that certain advantages and disadvantages may exist in the provision of shelters within the culture environment for abalone (Table 1).

Table 1-Advantages and Disadvantages of Shelters (taken from Hindrum et a1 1998)

Disadvantages

Advantages

- interferes with water movement in the tank

- can reduce the need to shade the tanks

- generates dead spots where organic matter can build up

- increase the effective surface area of the tank

- can make it difficult to readily observe the abalone

- abalone may feel happier under shelters than exposed, which may lead to better disease resistance

- an extra capital cost

- simplifies harvesting, especially for small numbers

- can complicate tank cleaning, and make it difficult to remove all the wastes

- more closely replicates natural their environment.

The addition of shelter materials has been linked to increased growth rates in abalone production systems, but minimal research has been carried out on the preference of one substrate type over another exhibited by H. laevigata. Preliminary studies carried out by Hindrum (1998) found that there was an interaction between the addition of shelters at high stocking densities and improved growth rates. This study compared the growth rates of juvenile H. laevigata over three different substrate types that were introduced into circular grow out tanks. The three shelters were, prefabricated cement Besser® blocks, cut PVC pipes and plastic corrugated sheets.

Materials & Methods

A growth and survival experiment, evaluating the effects of substrate was conducted at the Curtin University of Technology, Aquatic Research Unit hatchery, Bentley, Western Australia. Juvenile greenlip abalone supplied by GREAT SOUTHERN HATCHERY, Albany, Western Australia, were trialed with three types of shelters and their mean growth rate determined from initial and final measures of dorsal-ventral length and wet weight. Survival percentage was then determined with a transformation of the data using the arcsine statistical method prior to analysis.

The 60-day trial began in July 2001, with a two-week acclimatisation period of 108 abalone (2.53 ± 0.37g in weight and 21.92 ± 1.53 mm in length in a hatchery shade house. The experiment then commenced with the random allocation of 12 abalone to each experimental tank. The nine, 320 litre circular tanks combined with a 720 litre sump, resulted in a recirculating system, having a total water volume of 3.6 tonnes. The tanks were aligned in a row along the northern wall of the shade house. Water entered through a spraybar, exiting via a 400mm in length, 40mm diameter stand pipe, recirculating through a biofilter and protein skimmer. Each tank was covered with shade cloth to reduce light and prevent the abalone from escaping. The abalone were fed artificial food, of a juvenile abalone pellet supplied by ADAM & AMOS ABALONE FOODS, Mount Barker, South Australia, at a rate of 2% of their initial body weight three times weekly. All uneaten food and faecal matter were cleaned from tanks prior to feeding.

Water temperature was maintained at 18 ± 2oC throughout the experiment with the use of three, 330 watt bar heaters placed into the sump. Salinity was maintained at 35 ± 2ppt with readings taken daily. Fluctuations through evaporation were overcome with the calculated addition of aged freshwater. All other water quality parameters were also measured accordingly.

The three shelter consisted of PVC piping, corrugated plastic and prefabricated Besser® blocks randomly selected in replicates of three in a set line formation of nine tanks. The PVC piping, consisted of two 400mm in length x 90mm diameter pieces of pipe cut in half along their lengths placed inverted to create a shelter situation. The corrugated plastic sheeting was cut into two pieces, 400mm x 600mm each, having a radius of 15mm, placed flat along the tank bottom surface, creating a sheltered situation. Two prefabricated Besser® blocks measuring 400mm in length, 180mm in height and width, with two 180mm square holes evenly distributed along side length were placed along the tank bottom, with the holes to the side. (Figure 1)

Figure 1

wpe4.gif (8117 bytes)Click to enlarge 

Results

The results after the 60 day period show the Besser® block treatment had a mean increase in dorsal-ventral shell length of 4.51 ± 0.14mm The mean dorsal-ventral length in the PVC piping treatment increased 2.8 ± 0.94mm and plastic corrugated sheeting provided a mean growth of 2.61 ± 0.28mm.

Table 2

Mean length (mm) of each treatment

Time (Days)

PVC Pipe

Besser® Blocks

Plastic Corrugated Sheeting

0

21.64

21.82

22.31

30

23.11

24.44

23.56

60

24.44

26.33

24.92

Mean Growth

2.81

4.51

2.62

Figure 2

Click to enlarge

An increase in wet weight of 0.63 ± 0.11g was shown in the Besser® block treatment and mean wet weight grew 0.52 ± 0.37g with the PVC piping. Plastic corrugated sheeting provided a mean growth of 0.32 ± 0.10g in the wet weight. (Figure 3)

Table 2

Mean wet weight (g) of each treatment

Time (Days)

PVC Pipe

Besser Blocks

Plastic Corrugated Sheeting

0

2.48

2.49

2.63

30

2.92

3.09

2.95

60

3.00

3.12

3.05

Mean Growth

0.52

0.63

0.42

Figure 3

wpe4.gif (16399 bytes)

Click to enlarge

 

Survival at the end of the experiment showed that the abalone in the tanks with Besser® blocks had the highest mean survival at 75%, compared to the pipe mean survival at 69.44% and the plastic at 66.67%. (Figure 4)

Table 4

Mean Survival (%) of each treatment

Time (Days)

PVC Pipe

Besser Blocks

Plastic Corrugated Sheeting

0

100.00

100.00

100.00

30

94.44

94.44

91.67

60

69.44

75.00

66.67

Figure 4 

Click to enlarge

A one-way ANOVA (P=0.05) was conducted on the final measurement data for the three variables and displayed P=0.13 for length, P=0.88 for weight and P=0.96 for the arcsine transformed survival data. As this shows, no one variable was significant in the results displayed for the shelters.

________________________________________________________________________

Discussion

A previous investigation by Hindrum (1998) found that preliminary growth data indicated that at higher stocking densities, refuges could improve the growth and biomass production of greenlip abalone. Preliminary results in the experiment showed that one shelter was preferred out of three tested. Visual observations and growth data indicated that the greenlip abalone were most successful on the Besser® blocks. The introduction of the blocks provided the abalone with an environment most closely representing its natural conditions including crevices, shade, texture and increasing the surface area to volume ratio.

Juvenile greenlip abalone prefer to orientate towards cracks and crevices of reefs, owing to increased protection and shade, later migrating too outer reef surfaces when older and larger (Bell, 2001 pers com). The greenlip abalone were observed congregating in the corners of the Besser® block wall and under the blocks where a crevice had formed.

In the wild, most species of abalone are cryptic, meaning they hide away in shady areas (Fallu, 1991). The Besser® blocks provided the abalone with a dark environment in which to hide when not foraging at night.

Collection plates are used for the settlement of molluscs and alternately, used as a substratum for micro-algae cultures. Plates are seeded by conditioning them in the ocean and allowing micro-algae to settle and form the basis of a colony (Fallu, 1991). Although no conditioning occurred before the introduction of shelters it could be observed that the rough texture of the Besser® blocks formed by the limestone base provided an ideal substrate for micro-algae growth. The layer of developing micro-algae may have attracted the abalone to the surface of the blocks and provided them with a supplement feed.

Observations on tank design by Hone (1997) found that abalone within tanks were congregating. Covers and shading (shelters) improved the distribution within the tank and made more effective use of the horizontal surface area. The Besser® blocks provided an increased surface area to volume ratio that made more effective use of the tanks water column.

Although half PVC pipe and plastic corrugated sheeting provided the abalone with shade and an increased surface area within the tank in which to occupy, observations indicated that they tended to avoid these shelter types preferring to congregate around the edge of the tank and base of the standpipe. With no conditioning, the texture of the shelter surface was smooth and it was only towards the end of the 60 day trial, when a degree of conditioning occurred, that some attachment of abalone onto these shelters could be observed.

Although the conditioning effect has been a priority in the early stages of abalone culture it has been relatively unexplored in grow-out of juvenile abalone. This trial showed that abalone preferred to the occupy the rough, partially conditioned Besser® blocks rather than the smooth surfaces of PVC piping, corrugated plastic sheeting and internal tank. Their natural behavior to seek out a dark, rough substrate and crevices may have enhanced the well-being of the abalone and any micro-algae growth would have served as an extra source of nutrition. Therefore the Besser® blocks as a shelter or substrate may increase the level of energy utilised for growth by enhancing well-being and nutrition and further investigations into surface type may be warranted.

 

 

References

Bell, D. 2001. Abalone Aquaculture. Mollusc Aquaculture Lectures. Muresk Institute of Agriculture. Curtin University of Technology.

Fallu, R. 1991. Abalone Farming. Fishing News Books. Great Britain. p 31-155.

Fisheries Victoria. 2001. Abalone aspirations. ACWA News. 32(12-13). Jan.

Hindrum, S. Maquire, G. Edwards, S. Burke, C. John, D. 1998. Is the need for refuges in abalone culture dependent on stocking density for greenlip abalone?. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Abalone Aquaculture Workshop. Abalone Aquaculture Sub-Program. Fisheries Research & Development Corporation. July. Pp 1-4.

Hone, P. 1997. Abalone tank design. Developments in abalone aquaculture. ACWA News. 1(2) May.

Mosig, J. 2001. Industry -tailored abalone research. Austasia Aquaculture. Department of Natural Resources and Environment. Aug/Sep. Pp 36-40

Back Up Next

TOP

 

 

 

Send mail to info@adamamos.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2006 
Last modified: 12-Dec-2006